.Google's Martin Splitt answered an inquiry in the s.e.o Workplace Hrs podcast about whether recreating YouTube online video information into text on a web page would be considered reproduce content and also have a damaging influence on the websites positions.Although reproduce material is certainly not an adverse ranking factor, web content released on a more reliable site may cause the web content on the much less authoritative web site to be outranked. It is actually an authentic question to inquire due to the fact that information on an authoritative will certainly outrank the same information on a much less authoritative one.Some in the search community describe one piece of content taking over the positions of one more as 'cannibalization' of the page's ranking potential. This is actually the concern of the individual asking the concern.Google.com's Martin Splitt told the submitted question:." If I produce a YouTube video and after that take that exact content or even material as well as spot it on a websites, could Google.com flag that web page or even website for duplicate material?".Various Content Media Are Actually Dealt With As Separate.Martin Splitt responded to that both types of content are different as well as will certainly not be actually addressed as the exact same content, thereby releasing text message web content drawn out coming from a video recording will certainly certainly not be actually taken into consideration replicate information.This is his answer:." Absolutely no, one is actually an online video and the other one is actually text message material, and also would certainly be unique information!".Posting Extracted Text Coming From Video Recording.Martin applauded the concept of drawing out message material from a video recording as well as publishing it as message, keeping in mind that some individuals prefer to eat material in text kind instead of viewing a video. Switching the flow of web content from text to audio or video clip is most likely certainly not a negative concept additionally considering that some folks have problem reading text content as well as may favor listening closely to it coming from a video clip or a podcast style.Martin talked about printing video recording web content in a textual model:." It is actually also not a negative idea, some customers (like me) might prefer a text message version as well as others might certainly not have the capacity to make use of a video clip variation of the information to begin with as a result of data transfer or even graphic restrictions.".Takeaways.The idea behind the concern is actually repurposing web content and it's a really good idea. Look is actually greater than Google, it is actually also YouTube and everywhere folks get their audio material, like Spotify. The fact that there is no cannibalization of the web content between tools helps make repurposing a worthwhile technique to extending your material range.Listen closely to the podcast at the 8:20 minute score:.Included Photo through Shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi.